The New York Times has some important information to share about family-run amusement parks

The New York Times front page would like you to know: Family-Run Amusement Parks Surviving. “Sure, that is definitely red-hot, front-page-worthy news,” you’re thinking, if you’ve forgotten that the New York Times and Family Amusement Park Quarterly are different publications. I find it a little odd. I’m not the first to point out their tendency to be weird in their foreign coverage, but their local stories have even less excuse, since they live here. This is the paper of record, bringing me news I need to know? How is this news? What they’re telling me is that everything is the same, neither better nor worse, as the last time I thought about family-run amusement parks, which was never, because I don’t care about them. Hey New York Times, here are some other headlines for red-hot scoops you should look into.

Squirrels Neither Becoming Extinct Nor Developing Superintelligence

Politicians Meet to Discuss Where to Have Lunch

Beets Still Legal

Doctors: Illness is Hazardous to Health

Trains Running

Strength and Direction of Gravity Unchanged

New Jersey

 

Oh, and here’s a bonus one that’s legitimately surprising:

New York Times Surviving

This entry was posted in Lists, fake news and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink. Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.